Introduction
So, this happens when you can’t find a better offer for a film camera alone…
When I bought my Leica R5, it came with this little box in a bundle (or was it the other way around? Read this article to find out more about the camera).
The Summicron-R 90mm f/2 is considered favourite for the R system by many. It’s a Mandler design after all, known for extraordinary contrasty images, although quite soft and dreamy. I’m curious to see if that holds true.
After taking it out of the box, I was somewhat surprised. It’s a rather chubby little lens (only 62,5mm long, but 70mm wide), very heavy (560g), and built like a tank. I know, I say that a lot, but no other lens in my entire collection (except for my 85L maybe) feels as dense as this one.
Another quick snapshot I took after unpacking the lens. Say hi to my new king of lenscoatings!
The lens in detail
As you might have gathered, I’m a big admirer of Walter Mandler, ever since I bought the Elmarit-R 135mm f/2.8.
My copy of the Summicron-R 90mm f/2 has the serial number 3128744, which tells me (looking it up in this database) that the lens was manufactured in 1981.
The lens has a metal hood built in, which I find genius and really well constructed. The hood is made of 2 parts, so it’s very compact when collapsed. The lens will also extend when focussing to the minimum focus distance, without the front element rotating.
Above you see first the collapsed lens, then the hood pulled out and lastly the lens focused to its minimum focus distance (which is only 70cm).
The focus ring isn’t too loose but not too stiff either. Sporting a very long focus throw (about 270°), it’s a pleasure to focus this lens. The same can be said for the aperture ring. You get great feedback when working the aperture and won’t change it by accident.
The aperture consists of 8 rounded blades
As I said above, the lens is built like a tank. It feels great in your hand and because it’s so short, the center of the mass won’t result in a front-heavy setup with my comparably small Leica R5.
The lens is in perfect condition, I would rate it as “mint”.
The front element is huge and the multicoatings are simply beautiful
All reflections coming from one umbrella as you can see when the hood is extended
The lens really is quite compact, much like some of my fast 50mm lenses.
Sample Images
Here’s a very quick and unscientific snapshot to see how the lens renders.
One of my light stands indoors, against the window. As you can see, wide open the lens isn’t very impressive sharpness-wise, rendering a very dreamy softness with strong aberrations, but the contrast is quite impressive already. Once you stop it down to f/2.8, however, it delivers a punchy sharpness and contrast.
Above: Shot at f/2, iso 200, 1/200s
Above: f/2.8, iso 200, 1/200s
On my balcony there are two once-upon-a-time pretty bamboo torches for cozy summer nights. They made a great subject to see how the background (the hedge along the garden, the river and forest further away) in large distances is being rendered by a lens.
First up wide open. I’m already in love with this how this lens renders bokeh.
Stopped down to f/2.8 the bokeh is still very smooth and creamy, but the image gains overall in sharpness.
More Sample Images
A few days ago, I went on a short stroll (30 minutes) around the neighborhood and brought the 50mm and the 90mm Summicron along with me. I wanted to take some typical test images to examine the lens’ behaviour. Whereas I had felt okay with processing the files from the 50mm using the Velvia 100F preset, I couldn’t do this to the files from the 90mm. They all looked incredibly weird that way, with way too much contrast and saturation.
Instead, I applied other presets, like Fuji Pro 400H, Provia 100F, Kodak Portra 160 or 400, depending on how I liked the saturation, contrast and colours that resulted.
Images were captured handheld, focus achieved using the optical finder only. I did not remove chromatic aberrations, of which the lens certainly does produce some. To the right, I show some (near) 100% crops to better see sharpness, aberrations, glow, etc.
I really liked this lonely chair at the “cliff” (there’s a drop maybe 30m down through the forest into the river, with no fence to keep you from falling). The bokeh rendition is gorgeous, even with the subject nearly 5m away and the background rather close.
The lens is not nearly as sharp wide open as the 50mm or the 135mm, but it’s still plenty sharp and the Bokeh is on par with my beloved 85mm f/1.2L II USM as far as I can tell for now.
More on the Bokeh for close subjects and very close background.
The foreground bokeh is rather strange, but I didn’t focus on that, so this is the only image where there was something with a complex shape in front of the subject (the red branch below the green one in focus exhibits a strange pattern).
Some images I captured in the shade, during a short period with clouds covering the sun
They left a trail of.. whatever that is.. Also notice the strong bokeh fringing (green outlines) in the background behind the berries in focus.
The lens exhibits a beautiful glow around the focal plane
This image shows two things. Firstly, shooting against the sun does not influence the contrast at all. Secondly, this lens really has to handle a lot of green fringing wide open.
Another example for that beautiful glow you get.
This image was shot up against the sun, yet it has no effect on the result. The contrast still is amazing.
Here’s one I shot into the sun, to look at flaring patterns. (I forgot to reduce the iso, so the shutter capped at 1/8000s and the image was overexposed, but thanks to RAW files I could pull it back 2 stops to make the ghost visible.) Considering the huge front element, I’d say this lens handles shooting against the sun better than most other lenses I have tested so far.
I promise to deliver “good” sample images sometime in the future, but you’ll have to be patient. (Probably won’t make it before September)
04.07.2016
Today I brought my camera with me when I went out to buy some film (5 rolls of Portra 400) for my USA road trip starting this weekend. I had the 90mm and 50mm Summicrons with me, but used the 90mm more. All shots wide open (I guess it’s obvious that I like my lenses wide open..)
This is the legendary Zytglogge (freely translated, it means “Time Bell”) in Bern, where hundreds of tourists gather every full hour to witness.. I’ve got no idea what, have never seen it myself.
As you can see, the 90mm lens is plenty sharp wide open, if the cicrumstances allow. However, the vignetting is also pretty impressive if you ask me. (ps: I’ve got no idea what this figure/guy is doing up there.. I’m more impressed with the fine detail or that structure he’s standing in.)
This is the famous “Käfigturm” (“Cage Tower”)
There’s a few things to see here. First off, the old town in Bern is full of electric tram wires that mess with your images. Then, you can see that the details is still pretty awesome, although the focal plane is several meters in front of the tower itself (upper left in the crop). Lastly, the 90mm handles chromatic aberrations astonishingly well here. A few metal parts in the image are glowing a bright purple, but that’s about it.
I had to reduce contrast in this image. The 90mm Summicron really is a punchy beast.
In this image, the fine detail in the umbrella (a chain of small and large hearts along the rim) is barely visible because of the extreme contrast of the scene
I spotted these ladies with their accessory (the Swiss are world leaders when it comes to skin cancer, most of them don’t even use sunscreen, let alone an umbrella..) and quickly grabbed a single frame at the beep of my focus confirmation. Interestingly, this time the chip seems to be spot on (pun intended).
The last image I took today, unfortunately without the massive bumblebee that was sitting on this petal right until before I had my focus right (you can make out his slimmer cousin in the background, but the bumblebee was gone).
Here you can see that the lens is much softer than the 50mm. Also, the bokeh balls take on the shapes of cats eyes the closer you get to the image borders.
Update – September 2016
Finally, here are some portraits shot with the Summicron-R 90mm f/2
Some more samples from 2017
Took me quite a while to realise that the focus confirmation was 2 clicks off, so I had front-focus a lot of the time I used this lens. Now it’s pretty accurate at portrait distances.
R gear is really very nice… if you can deal with the weight. 😉
LikeLike
Not sure what you mean?
The 50mm isn’t much heavier than other full metal 50mm lenses I own, some are actually heavier. I don’t have any comparison to the 90mm summicron, except maybe the Contax 85mm f/1.4, which is actually a tad heavier and doesn’t have the hood built in.
The 135/2.8 is a very heavy lens, granted. The Zeiss Sonnar 135/2.8 is only 585g (and the Leitz is 730g) and there are a lot of rather fast full frame 135mm lenses that weigh even less.
However, and that’s a very important point for me, the Leitz lenses are built to a higher standard than any other lens I’ve ever held in my hands.
Lastly, my camera is a Canon 1Ds mk III which on it’s own already weighs in at 1’404g, so I guess I’m used to photography being a workout too. 😀
LikeLike
The 90mm doesn’t do well in the resolution tests. It’s only okay as an architectural lens but wow what a portrait lens. Great shots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think lens resolution tests can capture the superb image quality this lens is capable of making. For many years I shot the poor cousin version of the Summicron, the R 90 2,8 Elmarit. The Elmarit is sharper and a great lens, but recently I was able to buy a beater R 90 Summicron at an affordable price, and wow, what a lens! It is the best portrait lens I will ever own, and stopped down has that classic Leica look to the photos. Build wise, it is something for NASA to aspire to. Rock solid in every way, and it feels like a solid hunk of glass and metal in your hand, which is essentially what it is. A lot of people shoot this lens on DSLRs, but that sort of dumbs down the capabilities. I shot two rolls of color negative film with it, and the color saturation was very impressive. I can only imagine what slide film would produce.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Steve Marino. Thanks for your post, I’ve got the f2.8 90 but have been considering buying this f2 as I’ve seen one on a dealer’s website and have been seriously considering moving into portraiture next year. Will make a change from environmental and street.
Mitch Zeissler. I thoroughly agree regarding weight. The 135mm f2.8 Elmarit R surprised me when I got it four years ago. It’s got a large lump of glass in it, same as the M version. The 180mm f2.8 R and 250mm f4 R are extremely heavy lenses and both have tripod mount. However, a Leicaflex SL body and 250mm f4 would easily kill a prospective mugger. However as I use both lenses for cricket matches on village greens, (I’m in the U.K.) it seems unlikely that I’d be attacked.
Yet, I derive so much pleasure from my four SL bodies (1 black) and my collection of lenses: 28/35/50/90/135/180/250mm and a 75-200mm zoom lens. The build quality is amazingly good, real quality that surely is not made today except by Rolex/ Omega and Mercedes Benz (I have these watches/cars).
Prices for these lenses are rising for digital Johnny’s to use on their Japanese cameras.
I got busy and bought when I could. I’ve got a very generous young boyfriend who
“understands”.
LikeLiked by 1 person